<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What does Specter&#8217;s switch mean for obstructionism?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://filibusted.us/blog/archives/2009/04/28/what-does-specters-switch-mean-for-obstructionism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://filibusted.us/blog/archives/2009/04/28/what-does-specters-switch-mean-for-obstructionism/</link>
	<description>Congress is ridiculous.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 06:37:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://filibusted.us/blog/archives/2009/04/28/what-does-specters-switch-mean-for-obstructionism/comment-page-1/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 00:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filibusted.us/blog/?p=22#comment-19</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;But note one thing--Arlen Specter can talk about how he&#039;s all independent all he wants. But he just broke his ties with his base of support--the Republicans. And he did so to avoid a potential difficult primary. All Democrats have to do is threaten him that if he filibusters, they&#039;ll put in a lot of money and effort into his now Democratic primary opponent. If he wants to keep his seat, he&#039;s not going to want to piss the Democrats off too much.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But note one thing&#8211;Arlen Specter can talk about how he&#8217;s all independent all he wants. But he just broke his ties with his base of support&#8211;the Republicans. And he did so to avoid a potential difficult primary. All Democrats have to do is threaten him that if he filibusters, they&#8217;ll put in a lot of money and effort into his now Democratic primary opponent. If he wants to keep his seat, he&#8217;s not going to want to piss the Democrats off too much.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Dupont</title>
		<link>http://filibusted.us/blog/archives/2009/04/28/what-does-specters-switch-mean-for-obstructionism/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Dupont</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 04:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filibusted.us/blog/?p=22#comment-18</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Technically, it doesn&#039;t round at all. 59/99 is 59.59%, and that&#039;s less than the necessary 60% to pass a cloture motion.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Technically, it doesn&#8217;t round at all. 59/99 is 59.59%, and that&#8217;s less than the necessary 60% to pass a cloture motion.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://filibusted.us/blog/archives/2009/04/28/what-does-specters-switch-mean-for-obstructionism/comment-page-1/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 02:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filibusted.us/blog/?p=22#comment-17</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;How does 59.4 round &lt;strong&gt;up&lt;/strong&gt; to 60?  Shouldn&#039;t it round down to 59?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How does 59.4 round <strong>up</strong> to 60?  Shouldn&#8217;t it round down to 59?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Dupont</title>
		<link>http://filibusted.us/blog/archives/2009/04/28/what-does-specters-switch-mean-for-obstructionism/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Dupont</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 23:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filibusted.us/blog/?p=22#comment-16</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The word &quot;filibuster&quot; comes from &quot;freebooter,&quot; or &quot;pirate.&quot; It&#039;s just a turn of phrase.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The word &#8220;filibuster&#8221; comes from &#8220;freebooter,&#8221; or &#8220;pirate.&#8221; It&#8217;s just a turn of phrase.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Troy</title>
		<link>http://filibusted.us/blog/archives/2009/04/28/what-does-specters-switch-mean-for-obstructionism/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Troy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 21:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filibusted.us/blog/?p=22#comment-14</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;Filibusted points out legislative piracy as it happens.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&quot;legislative piracy&quot;? This is just as much &quot;piracy&quot; as is copying software. How lame.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Filibusted points out legislative piracy as it happens.&#8221;</p>

<p>&#8220;legislative piracy&#8221;? This is just as much &#8220;piracy&#8221; as is copying software. How lame.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

